Christmas dinner is not a dinner. It’s more like a botched crossover between MasterChef, Forums and an episode of A place in the sun turned badly. The initial idea was to eat. Instead we find ourselves with our fork in mid-air, wondering when the consent was signed to be evaluated on our body, lifestyle choices and reproductive timing.
The good news is that there is nothing wrong with it. The bad news is that it happens every year.
Panettone as a test of normality (spoiler: no one will ever pass it)
The scene is always the same. You who say “no thanks”. Someone who replies “but eat some panettone”. End of free will. In the Italian context, where food is still deeply linked to the idea of love and family, the pressure is often more subtle but more powerful. Not eating is not seen as a preference, but as a lack of emotional participation.
Psychiatry explains that during the holidays, anxiety related to food increases because eating becomes an obligatory social act. Basically, if you don’t eat you’re like what, in Squid Gamedecides not to participate in the games: you simply can’t.
The defense tool here is not to explain. Explaining is a beginner’s mistake. The more you explain, the more you give the impression that the process is open. The neutral and boring answer, the one that kills the conversation, works much better. “No thank you.” Point. Without a smile. Without justifications. After three times, the other will feel deeply uncomfortable.
Questions about life
Once the dessert is over, we move on to the real questions. Degree. Work. Engagement. Marriage. Children. In that order, like a combo menu. Here the psychology is crystal clear: a study of family expectations shows that these questions, even when they seem harmless, shape identity. Ergo: by hearing them, you start to wonder if you’re late or if the world has a problem with the concept of time.
The defense tool, in this case, is the gentle reversal, which is an art form. To the question “when are you getting married?”, use a philosophical answer, with something like Matrix: vague and unnecessarily profound. “It’s a period of transformation. I still have to put the pieces of my life together before deciding” Nobody will ask anything else, also because nobody really wants to know.
View this post on Instagram
Because at Christmas we all feel like children again (seriously)
The reason why all this affects us more than the rest of the year is simple: at Christmas we regress. We return – even unconsciously – to being children, grandchildren, “the one who still has to settle down”. It’s like going back to Hogwarts after working in an office for ten years: suddenly someone decides to tell you who you are. Even the most autonomous adult can suddenly feel observed and valued.
This is why jokes sting more, comments stick, ironic responses require greater effort. We laugh to lighten up, we change the subject, we take that slice of panettone “so as not to make a fuss”. But inside there remains the feeling of having to prove something: of eating the right way, of living the right way, of being okay.
Studies confirm it: it is not an individual fragility, it is the effect of a context that amplifies. The dinner doesn’t create discomfort, it makes it visible. Perhaps the true Christmas spirit today would be precisely this: to stop commenting on other people’s dishes and lives, at least for one evening.
The only real defense tool here is to remember that you didn’t write the script. You’ve ended up in a ready-made scene, with lines that are repeated every year. You can choose whether to recite them or improvise. And improvising, sometimes, also means getting up, clearing the table, going to the kitchen and talking to the cat. The cat, statistically, asks fewer questions and judges yes, but in silence and with a penetrating gaze. At least it hypnotizes.
Minimal emotional survival manual
There is nothing to explain or teach. No educational assignment has been entrusted and there is no obligation to manage the expectations of others. At the table you do not represent familiar customer service, nor are you required to provide clarification on every personal choice.
You can eat if you are hungry, just as you can choose not to. You can avoid responding, or move the conversation elsewhere, even introducing a topic out of context, as long as you do so with sufficient confidence to close the chapter without further replies.
The dinner will end, as these things always end. Applications will run out, at least until the following year. The panettone, unfortunately, will return on time. But being able to get up from that table without the feeling of having adapted to live in peace is already a small personal victory, even when the only concession was a piece of bread.
You might also be interested in:
