Elon Musk didn’t turn a business deal into a global sensation by mistake. The refusal by the CEO of the airline Ryanair to install Starlink on its planes became a public feud in a few days, culminating with the provocation of the founder of SpaceX: to buy the Irish company and replace its top management. An exit that moved the discussion from the technical field to the political and media one, without however changing the numbers on the table.
As reported by Politico, Musk publicly accused Michael O’Leary of being “misinformed” about the true costs of Starlink systems. The Ryanair CEO’s response was not long in coming: speaking on Irish radio, he called him “an idiot”, opening a sequence of mutual insults that shifted attention well beyond the on-board Wi-Fi.
View this post on Instagram
The Starlink node: connection versus costs
Ryanair operates over 600 Boeing 737s with one clear promise: minimal fares. Installing satellite systems means high investments and, above all, a structural impact on aircraft. External antennas increase aerodynamic drag and, consequently, fuel consumption. For a company that measures every gram of kerosene, the bill doesn’t add up: more operating costs and inevitably more expensive tickets on short routes, where the added value of Wi-Fi is limited.
Musk ups the ante
From Musk’s perspective, Starlink is a strategic showcase. Bringing it on board Europe’s largest low-cost airline would mean legitimizing it as a global standard. Hence the personal attack and the idea – more symbolic than realistic – of an acquisition. Also according to Politico, Musk went so far as to hypothesize the purchase of Ryanair to fire O’Leary, a proposal dismissed by the Irish manager as “Twitshit”.
A hypothesis that clashes with European rules: an EU-based airline must remain with a community majority. And Ryanair, which does not fly to the United States, does not depend on the American market to defend its model.
O’Leary’s response: numbers, not slogans
Michael O’Leary did not deny the quality of Musk’s system. However, he reiterated that, at current prices, it is not compatible with the objective of offering low-cost flights without mandatory extras. The company has been negotiating for over a year with multiple suppliers — not just Starlink — to obtain a solution that does not pass costs onto passengers, as confirmed by O’Leary himself.
Meanwhile, the controversy becomes marketing. O’Leary said that the visibility generated by the clash contributed to an increase in bookings and the stock price, going so far as to thank Musk for the “publicity boost” received.
Fuel, emissions and low cost model
There is also an environmental aspect, which is anything but secondary. Every increase in drag means more fuel burned and more emissions per passenger. In a sector under pressure to reduce climate impact, O’Leary uses the argument of consumption to defend a choice that is both economic and environmental. This is a request for efficiency: innovate, yes, with the same — or reduction — of costs and emissions.
The clash between Musk and O’Leary tells of two opposing visions. On the one hand the aggressive expansion of a global infrastructure, on the other the iron discipline of a model that thrives on razor-thin margins. Until satellite Wi-Fi proves it can fly light, Ryanair won’t welcome it. And Musk will remain grounded.
